Thank you, though there are some things I couldn't explain, like why Hermione didn't send her parents to Australia, or why Harry tought that he could destroy the diary in the fireplace, though the last one isn't that related to the timeline itself, there should be something in the timeline explaining why harry didn't have the knowledge that normal fire couldn't destroy it.By the way, if no one ever said so: "Very nice work there!"
I think that Hermione's parents needed to die in the first time-line. Much like the Durslys need to be killed as well. As for the dairy perhaps harry thought because it was the first horcux that it was not as protected as the rest. I could be wrong.Thank you, though there are some things I couldn't explain, like why Hermione didn't send her parents to Australia, or why Harry tought that he could destroy the diary in the fireplace, though the last one isn't that related to the timeline itself, there should be something in the timeline explaining why harry didn't have the knowledge that normal fire couldn't destroy it.By the way, if no one ever said so: "Very nice work there!"
I think it may have been a "might as well try it" sort of thing. If it worked, hey down a horcrux, if it doesn't all that is lost is a bit of time. So it was a worth a shot in Harry's mind. Hermione's parents going to Australia wasn't mentioned until book 7 I believe, and this does start after book 6.I think that Hermione Parents needed to die in the first time-line. Much like the Durslys need to be killed as well. As for the dairy perhaps harry thought because it was the first horcux that it was not as protected as the rest. I could be wrong.Thank you, though there are some things I couldn't explain, like why Hermione didn't send her parents to Australia, or why Harry tought that he could destroy the diary in the fireplace, though the last one isn't that related to the timeline itself, there should be something in the timeline explaining why harry didn't have the knowledge that normal fire couldn't destroy it.By the way, if no one ever said so: "Very nice work there!"
I wasn't really complaining about the fact that they died, more that I couldn't explain what changed to make it happen. Would actually make more sense in the timeline I made, if the Grangers where killed when a random DE attack destroyed the plane they were on (the negative effect would be the guilt Hermione might feel, since she basicly put them on the plane). Since that isn't what happened, I've been unable to explain it with anything but the fact that it happened, and that just bugs me just a little.I think that Hermione's parents needed to die in the first time-line. Much like the Durslys need to be killed as well.
As for the dairy perhaps harry thought because it was the first horcux that it was not as protected as the rest. I could be wrong.
While those auguments could be taken as somewhat valid (If you ignore the fact that the protection from destruktion from most things is not something to do with Voldemort, but just standard with Horcruxes), the fact that Harry was surprised that it didn't work makes them invalid, imo.I think it may have been a "might as well try it" sort of thing. If it worked, hey down a horcrux, if it doesn't all that is lost is a bit of time. So it was a worth a shot in Harry's mind.
I almost forgot this part: I know why it doesn't fit, but in my attemt at making a timeline I was able to explain most of the things so that it either fit with cannon, or was explained as a consiquence of Voldemort making a exstra Horcrux, and becoming more unstable (Still haven't got actual confirmation that this was the only reason things changed (unless you want to count the Authorlord post of "Very nice work there!" as such, and I don't think it can be taken like that), but I tried to see if I could make it fit). The Grangers and the diary are just two points I can remember were my imagination failed me, and I was unable to explain what could be the reasons for these things happening.Hermione's parents going to Australia wasn't mentioned until book 7 I believe, and this does start after book 6.
Honestly, this was written before Deathly Hallows came out, and I never anticipated Hermione basically mind-raping her parents. (Merged-Harry is only willing to memory-charm Snape as an alternative to killing him.)Personally, I never liked the way that Hermione did that to her parents. It seemed....off, somehow. I wouldn't worry too much about working that into the plotline.
This looks like quite a handy reference tool, and it also reminds me--does anyone know how Hagrid died? I remember most of the other characters' deaths, and I think he might have died at the Battle of Hogwarts, but I can't remember for sure.
When looking at what happened in NoFP and what was likely to have happened in DH, what Hermione did was properly the only way to save her parents, while still being able to help Harry. In a way she did it for the same reason Harry did it to Snape; To keep the people she cared about safe.Honestly, this was written before Deathly Hallows came out, and I never anticipated Hermione basically mind-raping her parents. (Merged-Harry is only willing to memory-charm Snape as an alternative to killing him.)Personally, I never liked the way that Hermione did that to her parents. It seemed....off, somehow. I wouldn't worry too much about working that into the plotline.
This looks like quite a handy reference tool, and it also reminds me--does anyone know how Hagrid died? I remember most of the other characters' deaths, and I think he might have died at the Battle of Hogwarts, but I can't remember for sure.
And it's hinted, but never outright said, that Hagrid died defending Hogwarts.
All righty, there we go. Until I explicitly hear otherwise, I'm going with the Blast Ended Skroot theory.And it's hinted, but never outright said, that Hagrid died defending Hogwarts.
Actually, it can fit quite well in this tread especially if you can come up with something Voldie did, either in the first or second war, that would have changed Hermiones morale enough to decide not to memory charm her parents.All righty, there we go. Until I explicitly hear otherwise, I'm going with the Blast Ended Skroot theory.And it's hinted, but never outright said, that Hagrid died defending Hogwarts.
And on the subject of Hermione mind-wiping her parents....eh. It seemed a bit morally iffy to me. While it is a good way to protect them, one has to wonder what the point of keeping them safe is if you're going to erase everything about them that was them. Plus, a bit of a big step to take without their permission. But that's probably a debate for another thread.
Yeah, that tidbit in DH completely broke my suspension of disbelief, given that her plan would require somehow forging a complete paper trail for her parents in order for their new identities to not fall through. This is aside the massive character derailment that such actions present.Honestly, this was written before Deathly Hallows came out, and I never anticipated Hermione basically mind-raping her parents.
For all we know all that a witch or wizard would need to do to forge a fake ID would be a couple of confundus charms (or something like that) on their existing ID's to make people adress them by other name's and not registrating them properly in the system, the biggest problem would be people who already knew them, and explain why they suddenly disapered without telling anyone where they where going.Yeah, that tidbit in DH completely broke my suspension of disbelief, given that her plan would require somehow forging a complete paper trail for her parents in order for their new identities to not fall through. This is aside the massive character derailment that such actions present.Honestly, this was written before Deathly Hallows came out, and I never anticipated Hermione basically mind-raping her parents.
Fixed.Most of them simply don't seem to think.
Return to “%s” Harry Potter and the Nightmares of Futures Past
Users browsing this forum: No registered users