That's true, so I wouldn't mind some clarification on some of the points you mentioned. I seem to be looking at this from a completely different mindset.unless you are both very good at Mafia (which I can say with certainty no one here is)
That sounds weird; wouldn't it be better to get some innocent lynched rather than getting nobody lynched in order to win more quickly?Mafia's goal is to survive as long as possible, thus it is in their interest to avoid lynching an easy target (Witt) early, especially if the alternative is a no-lynch.
I did say potential motivations, not all possible motivations. Though my conclusion that James likely got killed because he disproved himself to be mafia was apparently off, since at the very least one person disagrees with that analysis.profiling a Mafia NK in this situation is hopeless
Right, I should have mentioned that in my post somewhere.or the fact that either scum or the mod might have used an rng into account
That depends on your definition of terrible. Given the stated premises (no mind games etc.), the logic was valid (i.e. given the premises, the conclusion logically follows). The premises however were bad (especially "Assuming they're not playing seriously enough to not play really badly but not so seriously as to do some game within a game silliness"), meaning the logic was not sound.Wittgen's logic for voting DIT was terrible
It proves that the logic was not sound (i.e. the conclusions were wrong), as if it was sound, James would have been mafia and therefore would not have been killed.How does James getting NK'd disprove anything Witt said?
Yes. Lynch the wrong person and have the angel protect the wrong person, and it's game over.Not voting is the only correct course anyway, because lynching anyone this day would be stupid.
It stands for 'finger of suspicion' basically what Witt said. It's meaning isn't relevant except to 'vote without voting'FoS?
I have to admit, I had to look up the terms you used to get some of your points. http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... reviations helps a bit.Pn the super into Mafia: Everything I've been saying so far is Mafia 101.
This sounds like a very good idea for obvious reasons. Voting now pretty much says that you're either mafia, or that you are 100% certain that your target is; if neither is the case, you are risking the game here. Granted, the mafia would need to coordinate carefully to not give themselves away too soon, but it is risky.I would like to point out though that, even if you think I'm scum, everything I've said so far is true, this includes the 'do not vote in LYLO until you've determined who to lynch'.
Return to “%s” Role-Playing Games
Users browsing this forum: No registered users