Which hell? Not Christian hell, since you wrote:Scientists discover proof of hell.
First thought would be to cut some sort of deal with the devils.All humans, no matter their behaviour end up there.
If scientist can prove it exist, then in time it could be researched and proper 'weapons' could be developed.Also what would your reaction be? Would you be in support of blowing stuff up? Or at least conquer the place?
Nah, as long as the place is scientifically understandable normal modus operandi applies. It would be different if not for that assumption.Just in those places where the question has been asked before, there are some people that argue that this response is stupid and juvenile because we can't succeed in doing it. Or even interact with the place.
>Implying that with immortality, would not come a combination of breeding restrictions and much lower natural resource requirements.I agree about looking for a better dimension to pass the after life.
As to the search for inmortality, I believe that would only be a good idea if at the same time we sterilize the entire population in order to stop it from growing. The purpose of death is to make sure that a population does not grow at a rate beyond the point where its enviroment can sustain it. If everyone becomes inmortal, the growth of the population may reach exponential levels very quickly.
Even if we assume that as inmortals we don't need food, water or air in order to survive, we still be consuming resources as part of our daily activities. And I don't know what you believe, but living eternally in a barren, deserted and overpopulated planet it's not exactly my idea of a better place than burning in Hell.
Does not compute^^deserted and overpopulated planet
Return to “%s” General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users